Quadro4 700 XGL vs GeForce 8800 GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1131not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameG92NV25 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2008 (16 years ago)19 February 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors754 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.402.200
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount384 MB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz225 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s7.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 19 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

8800 GS has an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Quadro4 700 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop card while Quadro4 700 XGL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
NVIDIA Quadro4 700 XGL
Quadro4 700 XGL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 700 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.