Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce 8700M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.76no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG84Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2007 (17 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323456
Core clock speed625 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors289 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00432.0
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2007 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 28 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 158 Watt

8700M GT has 444.8% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 5500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8700M GT and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
GeForce 8700M GT
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 20 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.