Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI with Radeon RX 6600 LE, including specs and performance data.

8700M GT SLI
2007
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.73

6600 LE outperforms 8700M SLI by a whopping 4496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1223171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.9719.57
ArchitectureG8x (2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNB8E-SENavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2007 (18 years ago)8 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641792
Core clock speed625 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2495 MHz
Number of transistors578 Million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rateno data279.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.942 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Valorant 27−30
−4383%
1300−1350
+4383%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−4424%
950−1000
+4424%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dota 2 12−14
−4131%
550−600
+4131%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4400%
270−280
+4400%
Valorant 27−30
−4383%
1300−1350
+4383%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dota 2 12−14
−4131%
550−600
+4131%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4400%
270−280
+4400%
Valorant 27−30
−4383%
1300−1350
+4383%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%

1440p
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Valorant 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 33.55
Recency 18 September 2007 8 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 132 Watt

8700M GT SLI has 128% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 LE, on the other hand, has a 4496% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1043% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 LE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6600 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 48 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or Radeon RX 6600 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.