Radeon 620 vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

Place in the ranking	1148	847
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.93	3.22
Architecture	G8x (2007)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	NB8E-SE	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	18 September 2007 (17 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	384
Core clock speed	625 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	578 Million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	24.58
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.3
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

5−6

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	4−5
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−50%

3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

10−12

+0%

10−12

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 620 is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 620 is ahead in 33 tests (75%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.79	2.35
Recency	18 September 2007	13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	50 Watt

Radeon 620 has a 197.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 16% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.