GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs 8700M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI and GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8700M GT SLI
2007
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.68

RTX 5090 Mobile outperforms 8700M GT SLI by a whopping 9207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking116421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.9352.79
ArchitectureG8x (2007)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNB8E-SEGB203
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 September 2007 (17 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6410496
Core clock speed625 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1515 MHz
Number of transistors578 Million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rateno data496.9
Floating-point processing powerno data31.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data112
TMUsno data328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Valorant 30−33
−9067%
2750−2800
+9067%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−9150%
1850−1900
+9150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Dota 2 12−14
−9131%
1200−1250
+9131%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Valorant 30−33
−9067%
2750−2800
+9067%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Dota 2 12−14
−9131%
1200−1250
+9131%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Valorant 30−33
−9067%
2750−2800
+9067%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9186%
650−700
+9186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8900%
1350−1400
+8900%
Valorant 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 63.29
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 95 Watt

8700M GT SLI has 63.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 9207.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 72 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.