Radeon RX 5600M vs GeForce 8600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8600M GT and Radeon RX 5600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8600M GT
2007
512 MB DDR2, 20 Watt
0.29

RX 5600M outperforms 8600M GT by a whopping 7772% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1336247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.9910.43
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG84Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 December 2007 (16 years ago)7 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322304
Core clock speed475 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1265 MHz
Number of transistors289 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.600182.2
Floating-point processing power0.0608 TFLOPS5.829 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8600M GT 0.29
RX 5600M 22.83
+7772%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600M GT 112
RX 5600M 8795
+7753%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8600M GT 1040
RX 5600M 18582
+1687%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−8500%
86
+8500%
1440p0−157
4K-0−126

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3700%
76
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1575%
67
+1575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1225%
100−110
+1225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1800%
75−80
+1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−689%
221
+689%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3300%
68
+3300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1500%
64
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1225%
100−110
+1225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1800%
75−80
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−675%
217
+675%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2400%
50
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1350%
58
+1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1163%
101
+1163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1800%
75−80
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−611%
64
+611%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−14.3%
32
+14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14−16
Hitman 3 6−7
−533%
38
+533%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 14

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 137
+0%
137
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 76
+0%
76
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+0%
58
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70
+0%
70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+0%
67
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 197
+0%
197
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 20
+0%
20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
+0%
13
+0%

This is how 8600M GT and RX 5600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600M is 8500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5600M is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5600M is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 22.83
Recency 31 December 2007 7 July 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 150 Watt

8600M GT has 650% lower power consumption.

RX 5600M, on the other hand, has a 7772.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600M GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
GeForce 8600M GT
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 232 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.