Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce 840M

Place in performance ranking	794	307
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	N15S-GT	Navi 14
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 March 2014 (10 years ago)	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1536
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.98	139.2
Floating-point performance	0.8632 gflops	4.454 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16.02 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	2.0	no data
Optimus	+	-
GameWorks	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 840M 2.83

Pro 5500M 17.56
+520%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 840M 1090

Pro 5500M 6773
+521%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 840M 2340

Pro 5500M 14725
+529%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 840M 1573

Pro 5500M 10399
+561%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 840M 8724

Pro 5500M 65776
+654%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 840M 119888

Pro 5500M 364184
+204%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	45 −500%	270−280 +500%
Full HD	19 −211%	59 +211%
1440p	8−9 −563%	53 +563%
4K	4−5 −625%	29 +625%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−460%

27−30
+460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2800%	27−30 +2800%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −647%	110−120 +647%
Hitman 3	8−9 −325%	30−35 +325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −295%	85−90 +295%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1933%	60−65 +1933%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −971%	75 +971%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −383%	55−60 +383%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −124%	85−90 +124%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2800%	27−30 +2800%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −614%	50 +614%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −647%	110−120 +647%
Hitman 3	8−9 −325%	30−35 +325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −295%	85−90 +295%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −967%	32 +967%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −629%	51 +629%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −383%	55−60 +383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 −78.3%	40−45 +78.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −124%	85−90 +124%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2800%	27−30 +2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −400%	35 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −647%	110−120 +647%
Hitman 3	8−9 −325%	30−35 +325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −295%	85−90 +295%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −383%	55−60 +383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −550%	39 +550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −124%	85−90 +124%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−671%

54
+671%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −580%	30−35 +580%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Hitman 3	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −576%	115 +576%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−483%

35
+483%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	24−27
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−300%

16
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	41 +0%	41 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

This is how GeForce 840M and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

Pro 5500M is 500% faster in 900p
Pro 5500M is 211% faster in 1080p
Pro 5500M is 563% faster in 1440p
Pro 5500M is 625% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5500M is 2800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5500M is ahead in 61 test (86%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.83	17.56
Recency	12 March 2014	13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	50 Watt

GeForce 840M has 51.5% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500M, on the other hand, has a 520.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 840M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 840M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.