Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce 8400M GT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M GT and Radeon RX 6550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8400M GT
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.17

RX 6550M outperforms 8400M GT by a whopping 14712% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1408211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8521.95
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG86Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161024
Core clock speed450 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2840 MHz
Number of transistors210 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600181.8
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS5.816 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8400M GT 0.17
RX 6550M 25.18
+14712%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M GT 66
RX 6550M 9715
+14620%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−175
1440p-0−123

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1313%
110−120
+1313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−264%
100−110
+264%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1313%
110−120
+1313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2425%
101
+2425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−264%
100−110
+264%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1313%
110−120
+1313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2100%
88
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−444%
49
+444%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−264%
100−110
+264%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14−16
Hitman 3 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 12−14

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6550M is 2425% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6550M is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 25.18
Recency 9 May 2007 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 80 Watt

8400M GT has 471.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6550M, on the other hand, has a 14711.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6550M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GT
AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 152 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.