Jetson Nano vs GeForce 8400M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameG86MGM20B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 $99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16128
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data921 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20014.74
Floating-point processing power0.0256 gflops0.2358 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 2.0 x4
Lengthno data70 mm
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2 / GDDR3LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz3.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA1.15.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 10 Watt

Jetson Nano has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GS and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook card while Jetson Nano is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 8400M GS
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
Jetson Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.