Radeon RX 6300M vs GeForce 830A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.19no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM108Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256768
Core clock speed1082 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate18.40115.2
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce 830A has 6.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 830A and Radeon RX 6300M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 830A
GeForce 830A
AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 830A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.