Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs GeForce 830A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking765not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.40no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGM108Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2567168
Core clock speed1082 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate18.40694.4
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS22.22 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs16448
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce 830A has 809.1% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 830A and Data Center GPU Max 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 830A is a notebook card while Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 830A
GeForce 830A
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
Data Center GPU Max 1100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 830A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.