Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs GeForce 820M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 820M with Radeon RX 7900 XTX, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 820M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.28

RX 7900 XTX outperforms 820M by a whopping 6198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10358
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.70
Power efficiency5.8515.56
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF117Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 November 2013 (11 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores966144
Core clock speed625 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2498 MHz
Number of transistors585 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt355 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00959.2
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs16384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data287 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 820M 1.28
RX 7900 XTX 80.62
+6198%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 820M 494
RX 7900 XTX 31059
+6187%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 820M 1267
RX 7900 XTX 83322
+6479%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 820M 5106
RX 7900 XTX 148746
+2813%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 820M 897
RX 7900 XTX 64680
+7111%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 820M 6074
RX 7900 XTX 211480
+3382%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 820M 2775
RX 7900 XTX 211498
+7522%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−1580%
252
+1580%
1440p2−3
−8450%
171
+8450%
4K1−2
−10400%
105
+10400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.96
1440pno data5.84
4Kno data9.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5950%
242
+5950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2667%
166
+2667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5675%
231
+5675%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−6600%
200−210
+6600%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12450%
250−260
+12450%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1936%
280−290
+1936%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−367%
150−160
+367%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−5400%
330
+5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5100%
208
+5100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−6600%
200−210
+6600%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12450%
250−260
+12450%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1936%
280−290
+1936%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−6588%
535
+6588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−367%
150−160
+367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2133%
134
+2133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4875%
199
+4875%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−14650%
295
+14650%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2800%
406
+2800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−5788%
471
+5788%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2609%
298
+2609%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−379%
158
+379%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−16500%
160−170
+16500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−5500%
110−120
+5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−13100%
132
+13100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14000%
141
+14000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1586%
110−120
+1586%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−8100%
328
+8100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 238
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3000%
120−130
+3000%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−10900%
110
+10900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10600%
107
+10600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50−55
Far Cry 5 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 283
+0%
283
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 241
+0%
241
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 210
+0%
210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 171
+0%
171
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 146
+0%
146
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 360
+0%
360
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+0%
227
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 197
+0%
197
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 103
+0%
103
+0%

This is how GeForce 820M and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX is 1580% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 8450% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 10400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 16500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 80.62
Recency 27 November 2013 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 355 Watt

GeForce 820M has 2266.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has a 6198.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 820M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 820M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GeForce 820M
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 833 votes

Rate GeForce 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3678 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.