UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce 8200M G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8200M G and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 2520% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1430 | 669 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.12 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | MCP77MV MCP79MVL | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 0−1 | 17 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
11
+1000%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−143%
|
16−18
+143%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−44%
|
36
+44%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−12
−127%
|
25
+127%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−189%
|
26
+189%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−143%
|
16−18
+143%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−400%
|
15
+400%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−124%
|
55−60
+124%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−167%
|
24
+167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−143%
|
16−18
+143%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−167%
|
8
+167%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−124%
|
55−60
+124%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−1500%
|
30−35
+1500%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 29
+0%
|
29
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 2000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 27 tests (48%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (52%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 3.93 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 2520% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
