GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs 8200M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8200M G and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8200M G
2008
0.15

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 20200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1423188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.25
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLTU106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81920
Core clock speed400 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rateno data144.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1104
1440p-0−166
4K-0−142

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3050%
60−65
+3050%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2880%
149
+2880%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100
+2400%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2360%
123
+2360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−4840%
247
+4840%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1025%
45
+1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2450%
100−110
+2450%
World of Tanks 10−11
−2640%
270−280
+2640%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21
+950%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1933%
122
+1933%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2040%
107
+2040%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1580%
84
+1580%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−17400%
170−180
+17400%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2250%
90−95
+2250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Valorant 4−5
−2075%
87
+2075%
Dota 2 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 98
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Battlefield 5 0−1 31
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−480%
87
+480%
Valorant 0−1 41
Battlefield 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Valorant 140
+0%
140
+0%
Battlefield 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
Valorant 81
+0%
81
+0%
Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 123
+0%
123
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 30.45
Recency 3 June 2008 29 January 2019
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm

RTX 2060 Mobile has a 20200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
36 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
1711 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.