Radeon R7 360 896SP vs GeForce 8200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1337not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameC78Tobago
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)18 June 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16896
Core clock speed500 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00061.60
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS1.971 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs856
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data183 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 18 June 2015
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 85 Watt

GeForce 8200 has 113% lower power consumption.

R7 360 896SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200 and Radeon R7 360 896SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 68 votes

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200 or Radeon R7 360 896SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.