ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs GeForce 8200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1337not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameC78M82
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1640
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors210 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001.600
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIMXM-II
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 25 July 2008
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 7 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3410 has an age advantage of 2 months, a 45% more advanced lithography process, and 471% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200 and Mobility Radeon HD 3410. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 68 votes

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200 or Mobility Radeon HD 3410, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.