Radeon Sky 500 vs GeForce 810M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 810M with Radeon Sky 500, including specs and performance data.


GeForce 810M
2014
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.00

Sky 500 outperforms 810M by a whopping 1029% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1157459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.135.80
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF117Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 March 2014 (12 years ago)27 March 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481280
Core clock speed738 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors585 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90476.00
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs880
L1 Cache64 KB320 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s154 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 810M 1.00
Sky 500 11.29
+1029%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 810M 419
Samples: 98
Sky 500 4722
+1027%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.00 11.29
Recency 24 March 2014 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 810M has an age advantage of 11 months, and 900% lower power consumption.

Sky 500, on the other hand, has a 1029% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon Sky 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 810M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Sky 500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 546 votes

Rate GeForce 810M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 810M or Radeon Sky 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.