Radeon Pro W6800X vs GeForce 805A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.98
Power efficiencyno data14.05
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208Navi 21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923840
Core clock speed719 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz2087 MHz
Number of transistors915 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate12.13500.9
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Apple MPX
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataApple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

GeForce 805A has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and Radeon Pro W6800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6800X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 20 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.