Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce 800A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1045not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.66no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGF119Spectre Lite
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)17 February 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48384
Core clock speed475 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors292 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate3.80013.30
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS0.4255 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 90 Watt

GeForce 800A has 500% lower power consumption.

R7 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 800A and Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 800A
GeForce 800A
AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce 800A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.