ATI Radeon E2400 vs GeForce 800A

Place in the ranking	1044	1432
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.67	0.36
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	GF119	RV610
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	17 March 2014 (10 years ago)	28 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	40
Core clock speed	475 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	180 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.800	2.400
Floating-point processing power	0.0912 TFLOPS	0.048 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	11.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 800A 1.24
+854%

ATI E2400 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 800A 476
+833%

ATI E2400 51

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.24	0.13
Recency	17 March 2014	28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	25 Watt

GeForce 800A has a 853.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 800A is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E2400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.