GeForce 256 DDR vs 800A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1044not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.67no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGF119NV10 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)23 December 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed475 MHz120 MHz
Number of transistors292 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm220 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.8000.48
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 23 December 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 220 nm

GeForce 800A has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 800A and GeForce 256 DDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 800A is a notebook card while GeForce 256 DDR is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 800A
GeForce 800A
NVIDIA GeForce 256 DDR
GeForce 256 DDR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce 800A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 208 votes

Rate GeForce 256 DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.