GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs 7950 GX2

Place in the ranking	1227	1417
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.32	0.14
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code name	G71	NV38
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 June 2006 (18 years ago)	23 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

7950 GX2 and FX 5950 Ultra have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed	500 MHz	475 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	135 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	74 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.00	3.800
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	24	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	270 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	475 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	30.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	9.0a
Shader Model	3.0	no data
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
OpenCL	N/A	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

7950 GX2 0.52
+247%

FX 5950 Ultra 0.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7950 GX2 201
+241%

FX 5950 Ultra 59

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.52	0.15
Recency	5 June 2006	23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Chip lithography	90 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	74 Watt

7950 GX2 has a 246.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5950 Ultra, on the other hand, has 48.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.