ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs GeForce 7900 GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1179not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG71M64
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 March 2006 (18 years ago)1 March 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6
Core clock speed450 MHz479 MHz
Boost clock speedno data480 MHz
Number of transistors278 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.801.916
ROPs164
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz392 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s6.272 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 March 2006 1 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm

7900 GT has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility X2300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GT and Mobility Radeon X2300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GT is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon X2300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
GeForce 7900 GT
ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
Mobility Radeon X2300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 41 vote

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.