Radeon 660M vs GeForce 710M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 710M with Radeon 660M, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 710M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.19

660M outperforms 710M by a whopping 1269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1055329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.4928.19
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208Rembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 July 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed719 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors915 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate11.5045.60
Floating-point processing power0.2761 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1624
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 710M 1.19
Radeon 660M 16.29
+1269%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 710M 459
Radeon 660M 6285
+1269%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 710M 1107
Radeon 660M 6743
+509%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 710M 4641
Radeon 660M 23222
+400%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 710M 769
Radeon 660M 4848
+531%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 710M 5323
Radeon 660M 31515
+492%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−567%
20
+567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−93.8%
60−65
+93.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−313%
33
+313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−93.8%
60−65
+93.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−57.1%
22
+57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−238%
27
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−36.4%
15
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−93.8%
60−65
+93.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 9−10
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1140%
60−65
+1140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 7−8

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+0%
19
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GeForce 710M and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is 2300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 660M is 6400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 16.29
Recency 24 July 2013 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce 710M has 166.7% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has a 1268.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 710M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 710M is a notebook card while Radeon 660M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GeForce 710M
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 670 votes

Rate GeForce 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 305 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.