Radeon RX 560X vs GeForce 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 610M with Radeon RX 560X, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 610M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.75

RX 560X outperforms 610M by a whopping 1004% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1149500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.517.97
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF119Polaris 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481024
Core clock speed738 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors292 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90481.60
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS2.611 TFLOPS
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs416
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.75
RX 560X 8.28
+1004%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 610M 290
RX 560X 3196
+1002%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 610M 1387
RX 560X 16450
+1086%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 8.28
Recency 1 December 2011 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 610M has 525% lower power consumption.

RX 560X, on the other hand, has a 1004% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 610M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 560X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 709 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 383 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.