Radeon 630 vs GeForce 610M

Place in the ranking	1155	707
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.36	5.19
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GF119	Polaris 23
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2011 (12 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	512
Core clock speed	738 MHz	1082 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	1218 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.904	38.98
Floating-point processing power	0.1417 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS
Video decoders	H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p	no data
ROPs	4	16
TMUs	8	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 14.4 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.75

Radeon 630 3.72
+396%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 610M 290

Radeon 630 1434
+394%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−100%

6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

8−9

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	6−7
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	3−4
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−133%

7−8
+133%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 630 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 630 is ahead in 35 tests (65%)
there's a draw in 19 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.75	3.72
Recency	1 December 2011	13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	50 Watt

GeForce 610M has 316.7% lower power consumption.

Radeon 630, on the other hand, has a 396% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.