Quadro T1000 Mobile vs GeForce 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 610M with Quadro T1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 610M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.75

T1000 Mobile outperforms 610M by a whopping 2164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1157321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.2823.27
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF119TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
Core clock speed738 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors292 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90469.84
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS2.235 TFLOPS
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs432
TMUs848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.75
T1000 Mobile 16.98
+2164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 610M 289
T1000 Mobile 6540
+2163%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 610M 508
T1000 Mobile 11377
+2142%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 610M 2210
T1000 Mobile 31509
+1326%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%
4K2−3
−2300%
48
+2300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−860%
48
+860%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−600%
80−85
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 67
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−171%
80−85
+171%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−600%
80−85
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 52
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−171%
80−85
+171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−480%
29
+480%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−967%
32
+967%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−600%
80−85
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−250%
35
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−171%
80−85
+171%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 50

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 30−35
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−5000%
100−110
+5000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 12−14

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 8−9
Far Cry 5 0−1 9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 83
+0%
83
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+0%
114
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GeForce 610M and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 3000% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 2300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 5000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 16.98
Recency 1 December 2011 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 610M has 316.7% lower power consumption.

T1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2164% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 610M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 747 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 154 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.