GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs 410M

Place in the ranking	1184	215
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Power efficiency	3.91	24.18
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF119	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	5 January 2011 (14 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	2560
Core clock speed	575 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1035 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.600	82.80
Floating-point processing power	0.1104 TFLOPS	5.299 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	73	no data
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	8	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	+	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 410M 0.65

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 25.15
+3769%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 410M 263

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10128
+3751%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 410M 415

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+4251%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8 −825%	74 +825%
1440p	1−2 −4100%	42 +4100%
4K	0−1	28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1567%	50 +1567%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1729%	128 +1729%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1860%	98 +1860%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −838%	75 +838%
Fortnite	1−2 −12900%	130−140 +12900%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1400%	105 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1700%	160−170 +1700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −680%	39 +680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1620%	85−90 +1620%
World of Tanks	18−20 −1361%	260−270 +1361%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1067%	35 +1067%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −888%	75−80 +888%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1186%	90 +1186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1700%	160−170 +1700%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −3075%	120−130 +3075%
World of Tanks	2−3 −8550%	170−180 +8550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21 +600%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1850%	75−80 +1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Valorant	5−6 −1520%	81 +1520%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 −193%	44 +193%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −193%	44 +193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −193%	44 +193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	27−30
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
Dota 2	14−16 −260%	54 +260%
Valorant	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	87 +0%	87 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%
Valorant	121 +0%	121 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	58 +0%	58 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	94 +0%	94 +0%
Metro Exodus	62 +0%	62 +0%
Valorant	79 +0%	79 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	113 +0%	113 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	57 +0%	57 +0%
Valorant	112 +0%	112 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	41 +0%	41 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +0%	41 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	61 +0%	61 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	60 +0%	60 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	21 +0%	21 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Fortnite	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +0%	34 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how GeForce 410M and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 825% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 4100% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 12900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 33 tests (53%)
there's a draw in 29 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.65	25.15
Recency	5 January 2011	11 May 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	75 Watt

GeForce 410M has 525% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3769.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.