Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce 405M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated14
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.75
Power efficiencyno data17.19
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165376
Core clock speed606 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2394 MHz
Number of transistors260 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.848804.4
Floating-point processing power0.03878 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs4192
TMUs8336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 3 November 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce 405M has 2042.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 405M and Radeon RX 7900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 405M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1782 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.