GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs 310M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 310M with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 310M
2010
Up to 1 GB DDR3, 14 Watt
0.30

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms 310M by a whopping 25997% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13269
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.41
Power efficiency1.4924.82
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGT218AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores167168
Core clock speed606 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors260 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate4.848554.4
Floating-point processing power0.04896 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs480
TMUs8224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 310M 0.30
RTX 4070 SUPER 78.29
+25997%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 310M 115
RTX 4070 SUPER 30200
+26161%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1226
1440p0−1141
4K-0−188

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.65
1440pno data4.25
4Kno data6.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−8325%
300−350
+8325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−450%
150−160
+450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−10600%
428
+10600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1800%
170−180
+1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−450%
150−160
+450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−9425%
381
+9425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2133%
201
+2133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−396%
139
+396%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−1800%
110−120
+1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−10200%
200−210
+10200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6600%
65−70
+6600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 265
+0%
265
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
+0%
133
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 132
+0%
132
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
+0%
62
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 10600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 78.29
Recency 10 January 2010 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 220 Watt

GeForce 310M has 1471.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 25996.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 310M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 310M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GeForce 310M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 450 votes

Rate GeForce 310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3600 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.