Radeon Pro VII vs GeForce 256 SDR

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.72
Power efficiencyno data9.28
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV10 A3Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 1999 (25 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed120 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors17 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.48408.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.06 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/s1024 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 1999 13 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 220 nm 7 nm

Pro VII has an age advantage of 20 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 256 SDR and Radeon Pro VII. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 256 SDR is a desktop card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR
GeForce 256 SDR
AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 81 vote

Rate GeForce 256 SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1548 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.