GeForce Go 7600 vs 210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
205 OEM 210 210 Rev. 2 310 OEM 8400 GS PCI 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 8400 GS Rev. 3 9300 GS Rev. 2 9400 GT Rev. 3 G210 OEM Rev. 2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Go 7200 Go 7300 Go 7300T Go 7400 Go 7400T Go 7450 Go 7600 Go 7600 GT Go 7700 Go 7800 Go 7800 GTX Go 7800 GTX SLI Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS SLI Go 7900 GTX Go 7900 GTX SLI Go 7900 SE Go 7950 GTX Go 7950 GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 210 with GeForce Go 7600, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 210
2009
512 MB GDDR2, 30 Watt
0.27

Go 7600 outperforms 210 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GeForce 210 GeForce 210
Go 7600 Go 7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13311325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGT218G73
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)1 March 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1613
Core clock speed589 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistors260 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.1603.600
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.12.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 210 0.27
Go 7600 0.28
+3.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 210 122
Go 7600 127
+4.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 28 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.27 0.28
Recency 12 October 2009 1 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

GeForce 210 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

Go 7600, on the other hand, has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 210 and GeForce Go 7600.

Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop card while GeForce Go 7600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
GeForce Go 7600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ATI HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
Go 7600 GeForce Go 7600
vs
HD 6310 Radeon HD 6310
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
vs
ATI HD 4250 Radeon HD 4250
7650 GS GeForce 7650 GS
vs
GTX 460 460
GTX 1650 NVIDIA GTX 1650
vs
310 OEM 310 OEM
HD 6510G2 AMD HD 6510G2
vs
GT 240 240
R5 M250 AMD R5 M250
vs
GT 240 240
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
GT 240 240
RTX 4060 NVIDIA RTX 4060
vs
210 PCI 210 PCI
GTX 1650 NVIDIA GTX 1650
vs
GT 220 OEM 220 OEM
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
vs
GT 220 OEM 220 OEM
GT 1030 DDR4 NVIDIA GT 1030 DDR4
vs
GT 230 230
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE NVIDIA Ti 4800 SE
vs
GT 230 OEM 230 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 3762 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 or GeForce Go 7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.