Radeon R5 M240 vs GRID M3-3020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M230 R5 M240 R5 M320 R5 M420 R5 M435 R6 M255DX R6 M335DX R6 M340DX R6 M435DX R7 M260DX R8 M350DX R8 M435DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with Radeon R5 M240, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.07
+504%

M3-3020 outperforms R5 M240 by a whopping 504% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
R5 M240 R5 M240

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5941109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Jet
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)18 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640320
Core clock speed1033 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate52.2420.60
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4020
L1 Cache320 KB80 KB
L2 Cache2 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataNot Listed
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5Not Listed
Maximum RAM amount4 GB0 MB
Memory bus width128 BitNot Listed
Memory clock speed1300 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX® 11
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.1.126-
Mantle-+
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+471%
14
−471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and R5 M240 compete in popular games:

  • GRID M3-3020 is 471% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.07 1.17
Recency 18 May 2016 18 September 2014

GRID M3-3020 has a 504% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GRID M3-3020 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M240 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
R5 M240 Radeon R5 M240
vs
GT 625M GeForce GT 625M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
Pro V340 Radeon Pro V340
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
vs
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE
RX 560 896SP Radeon RX 560 896SP
vs
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
RX Vega Nano Radeon RX Vega Nano
vs
RX 560 896SP RX 560 896SP
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
RX 560 896SP RX 560 896SP
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
R7 M270 R7 M270
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
R7 M445 R7 M445
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
R7 250X R7 250X
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
8200M G mGPU GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-2Q
vs
Pro Vega II Duo Pro Vega II Duo
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
vs
CMP 170HX 8 GB CMP 170HX 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 57 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or Radeon R5 M240, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.