GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs GRID K500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK104G80
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (10 years ago)12 February 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $269

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153696
Core clock speed745 MHz513 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt143 Watt
Texture fill rate95.3624.62
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS0.2281 TFLOPS
ROPs3220
TMUs12824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB320 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s63.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 12 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 320 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 143 Watt

GRID K500 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1180% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

8800 GTS 320, on the other hand, has 57.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K500 and GeForce 8800 GTS 320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.