Radeon RX Vega M vs GRID K340

Place in the ranking	759	317
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	no data
Power efficiency	0.96	79.36
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GK107	Vega
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,299	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	512
Core clock speed	950 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1190 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	30.40	38.08
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	32	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	3.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.09	17.07
Recency	23 July 2013	1 February 2018
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt

RX Vega M has a 452.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K340 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.