Arc A730M vs GRID K220Q

GRID K2 GRID K220Q GRID K260Q GRID K280Q GRID K520 GRID K520Q Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
Arc A350M Arc A370M Arc A380M Arc A530M Arc A550M Arc A570M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K220Q with Arc A730M, including specs and performance data.

GRID K220Q
2014
512 MB GDDR5, 225 Watt
2.20

Arc A730M outperforms GRID K220Q by a whopping 974% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
Arc A730M Arc A730M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking865230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency0.7223.18
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK104DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2 July 2014 (10 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363072
Core clock speed745 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36393.6
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K220Q 2.20
Arc A730M 23.62
+974%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K220Q 912
Arc A730M 9808
+975%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−1133%
74
+1133%
1440p4−5
−1025%
45
+1025%
4K2−3
−1000%
22
+1000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p78.17no data
1440p117.25no data
4K234.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 169
+0%
169
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70
+0%
70
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 49
+0%
49
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+0%
34
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how GRID K220Q and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A730M is 1133% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A730M is 1025% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A730M is 1000% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.20 23.62
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 80 Watt

Arc A730M has a 973.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 181.3% lower power consumption.

The Arc A730M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K220Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K220Q is a workstation card while Arc A730M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GRID K220Q
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
vs
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
Arc A730M Arc A730M
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
vs
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
Quadro K4200 K4200
vs
GRID K520Q GRID K520Q
Quadro K4200 K4200
vs
Tesla K40d Tesla K40d
Quadro K5200 K5200
vs
GTX 880M GTX 880M
Quadro K620 K620
vs
GTX 660M Mac Edition GTX 660M Mac Edition
GRID K120Q GRID K120Q
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
GRID K500 GRID K500
vs
Tesla T10 Processor Tesla T10 Processor
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
vs
P106-100 P106 100
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s
vs
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s
vs
Quadro P2200 P2200
Tesla K40st Tesla K40st
vs
Pro WX 9200 Pro WX 9200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3
3 votes

Rate GRID K220Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
113 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K220Q or Arc A730M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.