Radeon 630 vs GMA 600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated703
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.17
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX535 (2008−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameLincroftPolaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 May 2010 (14 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32512
Core clock speed400 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors140 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60038.98
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2010 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 600 and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 600 is a desktop card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 600
GMA 600
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GMA 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.