Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs FirePro W9000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro W9000 with Iris Plus Graphics 950, including specs and performance data.
W9000 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 950 by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 350 | 583 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.98 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.96 | 29.70 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) |
| GPU code name | Tahiti | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 14 June 2012 (12 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,313 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.994 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 |
| TMUs | 128 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Length | 279 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| StereoOutput3D | + | - |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.74 | 5.64 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
FirePro W9000 has a 143.6% higher aggregate performance score.
Iris Plus Graphics 950, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 2233.3% lower power consumption.
The FirePro W9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 950 in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro W9000 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
