Radeon HD 6310 vs FirePro W8100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	289	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.98	no data
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Hawaii	Loveland
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 June 2014 (10 years ago)	9 November 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	80
Core clock speed	824 MHz	276 MHz
Number of transistors	6,200 million	450 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	131.8	2.208
Floating-point processing power	4.219 TFLOPS	0.04416 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	160	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	279 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Form factor	full height / full length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	512 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI	No outputs
StereoOutput3D	+	-
DisplayPort count	4	no data
Dual-link DVI support	+	-
HD сomponent video output	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	23 June 2014	9 November 2010
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	18 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---