Radeon RX 6500 XT vs FirePro W8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FirePro D500 FirePro D700 FirePro S9000 FirePro S9010 FirePro S9050 FirePro S10000 FirePro S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro W8000 FirePro W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6300 Radeon RX 6300 XT Radeon RX 6400 Radeon RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XTX Radeon RX 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W8000 with Radeon RX 6500 XT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W8000
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
9.32

RX 6500 XT outperforms W8000 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
RX 6500 XT RX 6500 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441237
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1354.71
Power efficiency3.2915.87
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTahitiNavi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 June 2012 (12 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6500 XT has 4742% better value for money than FirePro W8000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921024
Core clock speed900 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2815 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt107 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8180.2
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS5.765 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11264
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W8000 9.32
RX 6500 XT 21.40
+130%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W8000 4163
RX 6500 XT 9564
+130%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−133%
63
+133%
1440p12−14
−158%
31
+158%
4K7−8
−143%
17
+143%

Cost per frame, $

1080p59.22
−1775%
3.16
+1775%
1440p133.25
−1976%
6.42
+1976%
4K228.43
−1851%
11.71
+1851%
  • RX 6500 XT has 1775% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT has 1976% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT has 1851% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 281
+0%
281
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
+0%
72
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80
+0%
80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60
+0%
60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+0%
34
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Dota 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9
+0%
9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how FirePro W8000 and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT is 158% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT is 143% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.32 21.40
Recency 14 June 2012 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 107 Watt

RX 6500 XT has a 129.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 110.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W8000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W8000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W8000
FirePro W8000
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6500 XT
vs
R9 Fury Radeon R9 Fury
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
Instinct MI60 Radeon Instinct MI60
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RTX 8000 Passive RTX 8000 Passive
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RTX 3090 RTX 3090
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
A100 SXM4 80 GB SXM4 80 GB
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RX 6600 RX 6600
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB RTX 3080 12 GB
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro W8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3468 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W8000 or Radeon RX 6500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.