Radeon R5 (Carrizo) vs FirePro W7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D300 R5000 S7000 W4000 W5000 W5000 DVI W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Beema/Carrizo-L) (Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) (Stoney Ridge) A230 A330 A335 M230 M230 Rebrand M240 M240 Rebrand M255 M315 M320 M330 M335 M420 M430 M435 Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7000 with Radeon R5 (Carrizo), including specs and performance data.

FirePro W7000
2012, $899
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
10.30
+509%

W7000 outperforms R5 (Carrizo) by a whopping 509% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
R5 (Carrizo) R5 (Carrizo)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking478986
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.89no data
Power efficiency5.283.71
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code namePitcairnCarrizo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)4 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280256
Core clock speed950 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt12-35 Watt
Texture fill rate76.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.30 1.69
Recency 13 June 2012 4 June 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 12 Watt

FirePro W7000 has a 509.5% higher aggregate performance score.

R5 (Carrizo), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 2816.7% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
R5 (Carrizo) Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
Tesla K20m Tesla K20m
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M255 Radeon R5 M255
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M240 Radeon R5 M240
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M320 Radeon R5 M320
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M230 Radeon R5 M230
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M315 Radeon R5 M315
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 (Kaveri) Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M435 Radeon R5 M435
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 A335 Radeon R5 A335
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 62 votes

Rate FirePro W7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7000 or Radeon R5 (Carrizo), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.