Quadro T1000 vs FirePro W5170M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W5170M with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

W5170M
2014
2 GB GDDR5
5.68

T1000 outperforms W5170M by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking597320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.36
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTropoTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date25 August 2014 (10 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate37.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W5170M 5.68
Quadro T1000 16.76
+195%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W5170M 2191
Quadro T1000 6467
+195%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

W5170M 7983
Quadro T1000 33865
+324%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−180%
70−75
+180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Hitman 3 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Hitman 3 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Hitman 3 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Hitman 3 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

This is how W5170M and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 180% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.68 16.76
Recency 25 August 2014 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

Quadro T1000 has a 195.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5170M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5170M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5170M
FirePro W5170M
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 81 vote

Rate FirePro W5170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 388 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.