GeForce GT 750M SLI vs FirePro W5000

#ad 
Buy
FirePro D300 FirePro R5000 FirePro S7000 FirePro W4000 FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000 DVI FirePro W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy
GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 750M SLI GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GT 755M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W5000 with GeForce GT 750M SLI, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W5000
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
6.69
+12.2%

W5000 outperforms GT 750M SLI by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
GT 750M SLI GT 750M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.54no data
Power efficiency7.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePitcairnN14P-GT
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed825 MHz967 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million1300 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.60no data
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length183 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+5.3%
57
−5.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 163
+0%
163
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how FirePro W5000 and GT 750M SLI compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W5000 is 5% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.69 5.96
Recency 7 August 2012 1 April 2013

FirePro W5000 has a 12.2% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 750M SLI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

The FirePro W5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5000 is a workstation card while GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W5000
FirePro W5000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
vs
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
RX 550 Mobile Radeon RX 550 Mobile
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
FirePro S7000 S7000
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060
FirePro S7000 S7000
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
FirePro S7000 S7000
vs
RTX 4080 RTX 4080
FirePro W4000 W4000
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
FirePro W5000 W5000
vs
R7 M360 R7 M360
FirePro W5000 W5000
vs
FX 3800M FX 3800M
FirePro W5000 W5000
vs
HD 7970 X2 HD 7970 X2
FirePro W5000 W5000
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 3 GTS 450 Rev. 3
FirePro W5000 W5000
vs
8800 GT 8800 GT
FirePro W5000 W5000
vs
RX Vega 2 RX Vega 2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 127 votes

Rate FirePro W5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5000 or GeForce GT 750M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.