Radeon RX 7800 XT vs FirePro W4190M

Place in the ranking	771	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	84
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.70
Power efficiency	no data	16.57
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Opal	Navi 32
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 November 2015 (8 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	3840
Core clock speed	825 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	583.2
Floating-point processing power	0.6912 TFLOPS	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	96
TMUs	24	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W4190M 2.98

RX 7800 XT 62.94
+2012%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W4190M 1150

RX 7800 XT 24285
+2012%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

W4190M 2351

RX 7800 XT 65611
+2691%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

W4190M 1745

RX 7800 XT 49707
+2749%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

W4190M 12317

RX 7800 XT 202773
+1546%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	11 −1891%	219 +1891%
1440p	6−7 −2017%	127 +2017%
4K	3−4 −2367%	74 +2367%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.28
1440p	no data	3.93
4K	no data	6.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−4200%

258
+4200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −1878%	178 +1878%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −22100%	222 +22100%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −3880%	190−200 +3880%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −1529%	110−120 +1529%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −3117%	193 +3117%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1783%	110−120 +1783%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −1788%	150−160 +1788%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −1338%	230−240 +1338%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1450%	120−130 +1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −959%	230−240 +959%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −5067%	150−160 +5067%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1586%	110−120 +1586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −2033%	250−260 +2033%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −285%	150−160 +285%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −2800%	261 +2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −18000%	181 +18000%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −3880%	190−200 +3880%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −1529%	110−120 +1529%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −2583%	161 +2583%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1783%	110−120 +1783%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −1788%	150−160 +1788%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −1338%	230−240 +1338%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1450%	120−130 +1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −959%	230−240 +959%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −5067%	150−160 +5067%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1586%	110−120 +1586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −3217%	398 +3217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −843%	130−140 +843%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −285%	150−160 +285%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −1344%	130 +1344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −15700%	158 +15700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −1529%	110−120 +1529%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −2367%	148 +2367%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1783%	110−120 +1783%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −1288%	222 +1288%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1450%	120−130 +1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1145%	274 +1145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −2733%	340 +2733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −3233%	200 +3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −272%	145 +272%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−1586%

110−120
+1586%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −2350%	95−100 +2350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3867%	119 +3867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3600%	70−75 +3600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9600%	97 +9600%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2333%	70−75 +2333%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1025%	90−95 +1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2613%	217 +2613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −7250%	147 +7250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −1206%	230−240 +1206%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−1650%

100−110
+1650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −7200%	70−75 +7200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2950%	60−65 +2950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −4350%	89 +4350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −7100%	72 +7100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −4400%	45−50 +4400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	164
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −6600%	67 +6600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1500%

60−65
+1500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	124 +0%	124 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	148 +0%	148 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	243 +0%	243 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	118 +0%	118 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	44 +0%	44 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130 +0%	130 +0%

This is how W4190M and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 1891% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 2017% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 2367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 22100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is ahead in 61 test (86%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.98	62.94
Recency	12 November 2015	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm

RX 7800 XT has a 2012.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4190M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4190M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.