Radeon RX Vega XT vs FirePro W4100
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 774 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.48 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Cape Verde | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 August 2014 (11 years ago) | 8 August 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 630 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1630 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,500 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.16 | 417.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6451 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 |
| TMUs | 32 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 171 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Form factor | low profile / half length | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 August 2014 | 8 August 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
FirePro W4100 has 350% lower power consumption.
RX Vega XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FirePro W4100 and Radeon RX Vega XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FirePro W4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega XT is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
