Radeon RX 7600M XT vs FirePro W4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.87
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code namePitcairnNavi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed825 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate39.60316.0
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length183 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt

FirePro W4000 has 60% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4000 and Radeon RX 7600M XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4000
FirePro W4000
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.