Radeon RX 6600S vs FirePro W2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W2100 with Radeon RX 6600S, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W2100
2014
2 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
2.34

RX 6600S outperforms W2100 by a whopping 1415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking840140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.4931.97
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameOlandNavi 23
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201792
Core clock speed630 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors950 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60224.0
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.34
RX 6600S 35.45
+1415%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903
RX 6600S 13678
+1415%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−1400%
210−220
+1400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−3733%
110−120
+3733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1100%
70−75
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1850%
75−80
+1850%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1383%
85−90
+1383%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1545%
180−190
+1545%
Hitman 3 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−695%
150−160
+695%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−11500%
110−120
+11500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1055%
120−130
+1055%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−232%
120−130
+232%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−3733%
110−120
+3733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1100%
70−75
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1850%
75−80
+1850%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1383%
85−90
+1383%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1545%
180−190
+1545%
Hitman 3 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−695%
150−160
+695%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−11500%
110−120
+11500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1055%
120−130
+1055%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−469%
70−75
+469%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−232%
120−130
+232%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1100%
70−75
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1850%
75−80
+1850%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1545%
180−190
+1545%
Hitman 3 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−695%
150−160
+695%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1055%
120−130
+1055%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−469%
70−75
+469%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−232%
120−130
+232%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1600%
65−70
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Hitman 3 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1167%
75−80
+1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 35−40
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 16−18

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how FirePro W2100 and RX 6600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is 1400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600S is 11500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is ahead in 56 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.34 35.45
Recency 12 August 2014 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 80 Watt

FirePro W2100 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600S, on the other hand, has a 1415% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 6600S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
AMD Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.