Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs FirePro W2100

Place in performance ranking	848	531
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	Mars	Vega 10
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	26 August 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	3584
Core clock speed	680 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.60	336.0
Floating-point performance	0.4352 gflops	10.75 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Form factor	low profile / half length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort count	2	no data
Dual-link DVI support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.125

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.34

Pro V340 MxGPU 7.40
+216%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903

Pro V340 MxGPU 2853
+216%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10 −200%	30−35 +200%
4K	2 −200%	6−7 +200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
−180%

14−16

+180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −200%	24−27 +200%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Hitman 3	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −216%	60−65 +216%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −197%	110−120 +197%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −200%	24−27 +200%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Hitman 3	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −216%	60−65 +216%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −197%	110−120 +197%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −200%	24−27 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Hitman 3	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −216%	60−65 +216%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −197%	110−120 +197%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−180%

14−16

+180%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Hitman 3	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−180%

14−16

+180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−200%

9−10
+200%

This is how FirePro W2100 and Pro V340 MxGPU compete in popular games:

Pro V340 MxGPU is 200% faster in 1080p
Pro V340 MxGPU is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.34	7.40
Recency	2 October 2015	26 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	300 Watt

FirePro W2100 has 1053.8% lower power consumption.

Pro V340 MxGPU, on the other hand, has a 216.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.