Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs FirePro W2100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W2100 with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W2100
2014
2 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
2.02

P3200 Max-Q outperforms W2100 by a whopping 905% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking866255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.1721.49
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameOlandGP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201792
Core clock speed630 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistors950 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60157.2
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W2100 2.02
P3200 Max-Q 20.31
+905%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903
P3200 Max-Q 9077
+905%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−900%
120−130
+900%
4K2
−800%
18−21
+800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Fortnite 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Valorant 40−45
−876%
400−450
+876%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−809%
400−450
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Dota 2 21−24
−900%
230−240
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Fortnite 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Valorant 40−45
−876%
400−450
+876%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Dota 2 21−24
−900%
230−240
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Valorant 40−45
−876%
400−450
+876%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−900%
200−210
+900%
Valorant 18−20
−900%
180−190
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Valorant 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

This is how FirePro W2100 and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • P3200 Max-Q is 900% faster in 1080p
  • P3200 Max-Q is 800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 20.31
Recency 12 August 2014 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro W2100 has 188.5% lower power consumption.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 905.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 95 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 21 vote

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W2100 or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.