Radeon 660M vs ATI FirePro V9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.82
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCypressRembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 September 2010 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600384
Core clock speed850 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0045.60
Floating-point processing power2.72 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8024
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cache160 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1150 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2010 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 567% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V9800 and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V9800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 486 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V9800 or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.